﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><records><record><language>per</language><publisher>1</publisher><journalTitle>پژوهش سیاست نظری</journalTitle><issn>2008-5796</issn><eissn>2821-0239</eissn><publicationDate>2010-09</publicationDate><volume>5</volume><issue>8</issue><startPage>1</startPage><endPage>10</endPage><documentType>article</documentType><title language="eng">Historiographical &amp; Ideological Approaches and Publicizing Indigenous Thought:  Future of Western Political Thought in Iran</title><authors><author><name> </name><email>Nazarian2004@yahoo.com</email><affiliationId>1</affiliationId></author></authors><affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">Tehran University</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Most of the works on western political thought written in Iran, fall in an intermediary position between the two approaches of historiographical and ideological types. By historiography I mean an approach that, giving centrality to discussing elaborately the historical chronology of formation of a political thought, and biographies of the scholars in the field, neglects to analyze, criticize, and evaluate it. The second type of the works on western political thought is of ideological quality that giving centrality to a particular thought follows a biased approach to it. Such works try to promote an ideology regardless of the explanatory and analytical requirement for an argument.
The present article, studying features and consequences of the two approaches in Iranian works on western political thought, attempts to show the necessity for studying it with the sociological approach to thought, whose comprehensive and deep look at a political thought helps to closely understand it in its historical, cultural, political, economical, ideological aspects, and above all, its reflective view. Since a reflective view gives especial importance to the understanding and the criticism resulting from background conditions, subjective nature of cognition, and identity- cultural structures, it can help us with getting rid of the circle of imitation and repetition, and publicizing  indigenous thought, more than any other models.

</abstract><fullTextUrl>http://political.ihss.ac.ir/Article/11799</fullTextUrl><keywords><keyword>Political science
 Ideological viewpoint
 Chronology 
Indigenous thought
 Sociological Thought</keyword></keywords></record><record><language>per</language><publisher>1</publisher><journalTitle>پژوهش سیاست نظری</journalTitle><issn>2008-5796</issn><eissn>2821-0239</eissn><publicationDate>2010-09</publicationDate><volume>5</volume><issue>8</issue><startPage>1</startPage><endPage>10</endPage><documentType>article</documentType><title language="eng">The Influence of Technology on Democracy: Technological Democracy</title><authors><author><name> </name><email>Hedayatsajadi@gmail.com</email><affiliationId>1</affiliationId></author></authors><affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1" /></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">There are two general views on the impact of technology on democracy: a) technology is a threat to democracy, b) technology provides proper grounds for democracy. The aim of this article is to study the consequences of the influence of technology on democracy. Taking technologistic and cultural approaches, this paper studies the influence of technology on the four components of democracy as a government system- decision making policy, human beings as decision makers, community as consisting of individuals, and procedures of determining destiny- and argues that technology is an integral part of democracy in modern technological era to the extent that it entails making the new term as «technological democracy. This term overshadows the question of whether technology is a threat or opportunity to democracy. The question would be significant, when its purpose is to reconcile democracy and technology. </abstract><fullTextUrl>http://political.ihss.ac.ir/Article/11800</fullTextUrl><keywords><keyword>Technology
 democracy
 technological democracy
 technologistic approach
 decision-making</keyword></keywords></record><record><language>per</language><publisher>1</publisher><journalTitle>پژوهش سیاست نظری</journalTitle><issn>2008-5796</issn><eissn>2821-0239</eissn><publicationDate>2010-09</publicationDate><volume>5</volume><issue>8</issue><startPage>1</startPage><endPage>10</endPage><documentType>article</documentType><title language="eng">Chinese Society of Homogeneity and Harmony: A Critical and Analytical Approach</title><authors><author><name> </name><email>Hoosein.jamalii@gmail.com</email><affiliationId>1</affiliationId></author></authors><affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1" /></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">China, experiencing fundamental changes and transformations, has attracted many attentions, today. One of the changes in the past decade was in its leaders’ orientations to constructing a homogeneous and harmonious society which entails solidarity among its human communities, and its adaptability with nature. 
Studying such a society in the light of objectives of development, theories on transition to democracy, adaptability of socialism, modernism and tradition, ideological and utopian processes, and functions of political systems can to a greet effect make its complex aspects clear . The main idea of the present paper is that pragmatism has functioned more effectively in China’s progress towards a homogeneous and harmonious society than any other factors, very function of which can be evaluated just considering their interactions with pragmatism. 
</abstract><fullTextUrl>http://political.ihss.ac.ir/Article/11801</fullTextUrl><keywords><keyword>A homogeneous and harmonious society
 Pragmatism
 Democracy
 Socialism
 Development
 Utopia
 China</keyword></keywords></record><record><language>per</language><publisher>1</publisher><journalTitle>پژوهش سیاست نظری</journalTitle><issn>2008-5796</issn><eissn>2821-0239</eissn><publicationDate>2010-09</publicationDate><volume>5</volume><issue>8</issue><startPage>1</startPage><endPage>10</endPage><documentType>article</documentType><title language="eng">Theory of Domination in the Political Views of Ibn- Farra’ Hanbali</title><authors><author><name> </name><email>Fadaiemehdi@yahoo.com</email><affiliationId>1</affiliationId></author></authors><affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1" /></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Abu Yaala Mohammad Ibn Al-Hossain Ibn Mohammad Ibn Khalaf Ibn Mohammad known as “Ibn Farra” (990- 1066) is an Islamic Jurisprudent who played a great role in expansion of Hanbali school of Islam. His works portray him as a strict Sunni jurisconsult.  In his book named “ Al-Ahkam Al-Sultanniah” he attempts to provide a religious jurisprudential justification for political dominations of the rulers. He can be considered as one important figure of domination theory (Istiilla and Taqallub) among the Sunni. He has not been introduced or studied to and in  Farsi. In this article we survey various aspects of his political views.</abstract><fullTextUrl>http://political.ihss.ac.ir/Article/11802</fullTextUrl><keywords><keyword>political jurisprudence
Ibn Farra’
 Sultan
 Amir
 Emirate of efficiency (imarat-i istikfa’)
 Emirate of dominance (imarat-i istiila’)
 velayat</keyword></keywords></record><record><language>per</language><publisher>1</publisher><journalTitle>پژوهش سیاست نظری</journalTitle><issn>2008-5796</issn><eissn>2821-0239</eissn><publicationDate>2010-09</publicationDate><volume>5</volume><issue>8</issue><startPage>1</startPage><endPage>10</endPage><documentType>article</documentType><title language="eng">John Rawls’ Theory of Political Justice:  A Solution for the Contradiction between Equality and Freedom </title><authors><author><name>mohamad ali tavana</name><email>tavana.mohammad@yahoo.com</email><affiliationId>1</affiliationId></author></authors><affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1">دانشگاه شیراز گروه علوم سیاسی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی</affiliationName></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">To find a solution to obviate the contradiction between equality and freedom is one challenging problem in political philosophy. All schools- from liberal to multiculturalist- have tried to solve the it. One important attempt is John Rawls’ theory of political philosophy where he puts forward political liberalism as a key concept. Taking a critical approach, the present article studies Rawls’ theory. In doing so, it employs an analytical framework, and the method of content analysis. Firs, it introduces the basic elements and principles of the theory, then it examines how compatible or contradictory they are with conclusions made, and finally discusses the (in)efficiency of the theory in obviating the problem of freedom and equality.</abstract><fullTextUrl>http://political.ihss.ac.ir/Article/11803</fullTextUrl><keywords><keyword>Jhon Rawls
Theory of Justice
 Liberalism
 Equality 
Freedom</keyword></keywords></record><record><language>per</language><publisher>1</publisher><journalTitle>پژوهش سیاست نظری</journalTitle><issn>2008-5796</issn><eissn>2821-0239</eissn><publicationDate>2010-09</publicationDate><volume>5</volume><issue>8</issue><startPage>1</startPage><endPage>10</endPage><documentType>article</documentType><title language="eng">A Study of Adel Daher’s Philosophical   and Political Views</title><authors><author><name> </name><email>Fmkhanii@yahoo.com</email><affiliationId>1</affiliationId></author></authors><affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1" /></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Adel Daher is one of the sophisticated Arab intellectuals who is unknown in Iran. Like any modern philosopher, he considers intellect as the first means of identification. Dividing intellect into two parts of theoretical and practical, he believes that besides identifying the means to attain goals (teleos), intellect also serves to determine the very goals. In other words, he believes in goal-oriented rationality as well as value-oriented rationality.
He does not think of philosophical thought as a profession, detached from human community; rather, he considers it as bearing the task of criticizing and modification of social life. He believes that if the core of religion is truly understood, then it becomes clear that those who believe in the necessity of the relation between religion and worldly mundane life are false. 
The present paper studies the main theoretical framework of this Lebanese thinker’s views based on a metatheoretical approach. 

</abstract><fullTextUrl>http://political.ihss.ac.ir/Article/11804</fullTextUrl><keywords><keyword>intellect
 knowledge
 ethics
 politics
religion</keyword></keywords></record><record><language>per</language><publisher>1</publisher><journalTitle>پژوهش سیاست نظری</journalTitle><issn>2008-5796</issn><eissn>2821-0239</eissn><publicationDate>2010-09</publicationDate><volume>5</volume><issue>8</issue><startPage>1</startPage><endPage>10</endPage><documentType>article</documentType><title language="eng">The Political and Cultural Impacts of Globalization on Iranian Ethnic Groups (A Field Study on Azeri, Arab, Kurd and Baluch Students)</title><authors><author><name> </name><email>Al.omidi@gmail.com</email><affiliationId>1</affiliationId></author><author><name> </name><email>Fater.rezaei@yahoo.com</email><affiliationId>2</affiliationId></author></authors><affiliationsList><affiliationName affiliationId="1" /><affiliationName affiliationId="2" /></affiliationsList><abstract language="eng">Globalization is one characteristic of the world today. On the other hand, ethnicity, under some conditions, provides an excuse for political tensions.  There are various views on the effects of globalization on ethnicity. Some theoreticians believe that as globalization grows, identity of ethnic minorities undergoes the assimilation of the values of the mainstream culture, which in turn is absorbed into the dominant global culture. However, others believe that globalization helps increase political self-awareness of ethnic groups. Overall study of these views show that political aspect of ethnicity is a function of different domestic and world factors, and is not of the same situation in all countries. In the present article, we study political and social situation of four Iranian ethnic minorities- Azeri, Arab, Baluch and Kurd. This is a field study. The data is gathered using questionnaires and interviews. Findings of the research show that while globalization, culturally, has led to a decrease in strictness of minorities over their cultural features- except language, it, politically, has resulted in a rise in their awareness and demands. Hence, to manage the demands, the government is expected to take felicity measures, including: promoting democratization, creating equal opportunities for political and economical participation of all groups, lowering the center-periphery distance through fair budget, and encouraging the national will for employment and removing deprivation.

</abstract><fullTextUrl>http://political.ihss.ac.ir/Article/11805</fullTextUrl><keywords><keyword>Globalization
 ethnicity
 Kurd
 Arab
 Baluch
 Azeri
 politics
 culture</keyword></keywords></record></records>