The Islamic Revolution: The Competition Between the Shah's Utopia and the Revolution's Utopia
Subject Areas : Research in Theoritical Politics
Mohammad Samiei
1
*
,
Mahmood Mohammadi
2
1 - Associate Professor, Department of Iranian Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Ph.D. Student, Department of Iranian Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Keywords: Utopia, Imam Khomeini, Motahari, Shariati, Pahlavi.,
Abstract :
The Islamic Revolution: The Competition Between
the Shah's Utopia and the Revolution's Utopia
Mohammad Samii*
Mahmoud Mohammadi**
Revolution can be understood as a competition between utopias that are articulated, on the one hand, by the established ruling order and, on the other, by revolutionary opponents for the masses. In the years leading up to the Islamic Revolution of Iran, the Pahlavi regime portrayed a bright future for Iranians, while revolutionary thinkers likewise articulated visions of the future and constructed their own utopias. In effect, the revolution was a competition between these two sets of utopian visions. This perspective, however, has received relatively little attention in analyses of the Islamic Revolution of Iran.
The present study, drawing on Karl Mannheim’s theory of ideology and utopia, examines and compares the utopian visions of the two principal opposing poles in the Islamic Revolution of Iran: Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, representing the ruling establishment, and the theorists of the revolution, namely Imam Khomeini, Morteza Motahhari, and Ali Shariati. The aim of this study is to analyze the role of utopian thought in the formation of the Islamic Revolution and to understand the fundamental differences between these two types of utopias. In this regard, the article seeks to determine how the utopias of these two poles differed from one another and why one proved successful, while the other failed, in attracting the support of the masses.
The findings of the study indicate that the utopia articulated by the theorists of the revolution, characterized by elements such as mystery and spirituality, flexibility of expression, revolutionary nature, and a strong capacity for popular mobilization, was able to provide a powerful driving force for the revolution. By contrast, the Shah’s utopia, although based on a modern blueprint and focused on development and the project of the “Great Civilization,” failed to achieve comparable success due to its worldly character, structural limitations, and lack of popular mobilization. This study underscores the importance of paying attention to utopian thought in the analysis of revolutions and demonstrates that differences in the nature and function of utopias can be a determining factor in the success or failure of revolutionary movements.
Keywords: Utopia, Imam Khomeini, Motahari, Shariati, Pahlavi.
- Introduction and Statement of the Problem
Utopia, in its literal sense, refers to an imaginary city that embodies perfection and beauty and offers human beings a life of happiness and fulfillment. From a sociological perspective, utopia is not merely a literary fantasy, but rather an ideal political society in which its inhabitants exist in a desirable and optimal condition. One of the principal conditions for the emergence of revolutions is precisely the articulation of such a utopia, since every revolution is inherently opposed to the existing order and projects a vision of a desirable future. This characteristic fully corresponds to what is referred to as utopian thought—an outlook that draws nourishment from deep dissatisfaction with the present and depicts human liberation in the future.
In the course of the Islamic Revolution of Iran, two rival models of utopia confronted one another. On the one hand, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, particularly in his book Toward the Great Civilization (1977), presented an image of a modern and advanced Iran as the inevitable future of the country. On the other hand, Muslim theorists and opponents of the regime constructed their utopia on the basis of religious values and social justice. The fundamental question of this research is why, despite the fact that both sides—the ruling establishment and the revolutionaries—possessed utopian visions, the utopia of the revolutionaries succeeded in mobilizing the masses, while the Shah’s utopia failed to attract popular support. Through a comparative examination of the views of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Imam Khomeini, Morteza Motahhari, and Ali Shariati, this study seeks to explain the reasons for this success and failure.
- Theoretical Framework: The Role of Utopia in Social Movements
The theoretical framework of this study is grounded in the relationship between dissatisfaction and change. According to theorists such as Sargent and Mannheim, the first defining feature of utopian works is revulsion toward society and suffering caused by the existing condition. Utopias typically reflect the objective circumstances of each society and articulate the problems of their time. In his book Ideology and Utopia, Karl Mannheim distinguishes between two forms of thought: ideology, which serves to preserve the existing order, and utopia, which functions as a catalyst for change and the improvement of social conditions.
Similarly, Melvin Lasky argues in Utopia and Revolution that utopian ideas can become powerful drivers of revolutionary transformation, provided that they resonate with social realities. On this basis, successful revolutionary utopias generally possess four key characteristics: (1) ambiguity and flexibility of expression, which allow different social groups to project their aspirations onto them; (2) a revolutionary and abrupt character, favoring fundamental transformation over gradual reform; (3) a non-governmental origin, emerging from within society rather than from above; and (4) a strong capacity for popular mobilization.
- Research Methodology
This study employs a qualitative comparative method based on case analysis. Through this approach, the researcher seeks to gain in-depth insight and provide a comprehensive description of social processes. Given the limited number of cases examined (four figures), this method makes it possible to analyze the deeper and often hidden layers of thought. To this end, a ten-dimensional comparative model has been developed, encompassing components such as origin, content, the role of religion, the position of the people, political system, social justice, means of realization, degree of ambiguity, responsiveness to the needs of the time, and mobilization capacity.
- Research Findings: Analysis of Competing Utopias
4.1. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi’s Utopia: The Great Civilization
The Shah’s utopia, promoted during the final years of his reign, had a distinctly governmental and top-down origin. He defined his goal as achieving the era of the “Great Civilization,” understood as providing the highest level of material and spiritual life through science and industry.
Content and political system: The Shah outlined his ideal system across four domains—political, economic, social, and educational. He emphasized “independent national policy” and the Rastakhiz Party, arguing that Western-style democracy led to fragmentation; therefore, he proposed a single-party model as a form of guided participation.
Religion and spirituality: Although the Shah emphasized Islam, he viewed it primarily as an ethical support for material modernization. He spoke of religious faith while simultaneously confronting what he described as “reactionary” forces.
Social justice: He conceived justice in terms of the White Revolution, profit-sharing with workers, and land reform. However, due to the authoritarian nature of these measures, they failed to establish an emotional bond with the masses.
Means of realization: His approach relied on gradual reform initiated by the state. His utopia lacked ambiguity, and its excessive clarity and focus on technical and administrative details left little room for collective imagination and hope.
4.2. Imam Khomeini’s Utopia: Islamic Government
Imam Khomeini’s thought emerged in reaction to the anti-Islamic policies of the Pahlavi regime and the penetration of Western culture. The origin of this utopia was revolutionary and bottom-up.
Content: In Kashf al-Asrar, Imam Khomeini described a religious state as a “paradise on earth,” to be established by the clergy. His goal was the implementation of Qur’anic law so that human happiness might be realized.
Political system and leadership: He founded his political vision on the principle of velayat-e faqih. In this model, the clergy function as the head in relation to the body of the state. Legislation was viewed as the exclusive right of God, and Western laws were dismissed.
The role of the people: Unlike the Shah’s model, Imam Khomeini regarded the people as the primary agents of change, believing that it was the masses who must rise up against unjust governments.
Mobilization capacity: By linking sacred concepts with promises of both worldly justice and otherworldly salvation, his utopia generated immense capacity for mass mobilization.
4.3. Morteza Motahhari’s Utopia: Historical Evolution and Mahdist Justice
Motahhari viewed utopia through the lens of the philosophy of history and movement toward perfection. He believed that every revolution is rooted in dissatisfaction with the present and aspiration for an ideal condition.
Content and justice: Motahhari emphasized the idea of a classless Islamic society—one free of oppression and tyranny, yet based on natural differences in talent. He accepted reciprocal interaction within society.
Political system: In his view, the jurist-ruler functions as an ideologue who oversees the correct implementation of ideology, rather than serving merely as an executive authority. He stressed intellectual freedom and open engagement with opposing ideas.
Religion and spirituality: Motahhari regarded spirituality as the core of society and warned that without justice and reasonable freedom, the Islamic Republic would fail. His utopia served as a prelude to the Mahdi’s uprising and the final perfection of history.
4.4. Ali Shariati’s Utopia: Ummah and Imamate
Shariati viewed human beings as inherently utopia-seeking and considered religion to be fundamentally utopian in nature. He reconstructed Islam as a liberating ideology.
Content: His utopia, termed the ummah, was a society founded upon three symbols: the Book (awareness), the Scale (justice), and Iron (power). He sought the realization of spirituality, freedom, and equality.
Political system: Shariati identified the organizing principle of the ummah as imamate and emphasized the role of the “responsible intellectual” as the successor to the prophets. He believed the intellectual must guide humanity from what is to what ought to be.
Social justice: He strongly opposed exploitation, despotism, and deception, envisioning a classless society in which human values replace material ones.
Mobilization capacity: Shariati’s symbolic language and use of figures such as Abu Dharr and Husayn endowed his discourse with exceptional power to mobilize youth and intellectuals against the established order.
- Analysis and Discussion: The Confrontation of Two Utopian Logics
Comparative analysis reveals several reasons why the Shah’s utopia was rejected while the revolutionaries’ utopia prevailed.
First, origin and nature: The Shah’s utopia was top-down and directive, viewing the people merely as executors of orders. In contrast, the revolutionaries’ utopia was bottom-up, emerging from the cultural and historical fabric of society.
Second, the role of religion and identity: The Shah treated religion as a decorative supplement to material development, conflicting with the deeply religious identity of Iranian society. Revolutionary leaders, by contrast, placed religion at the core of their utopia.
Third, clarity versus inspirational ambiguity: The Shah’s programmatic and technical approach lacked imaginative power, whereas revolutionary utopias were accompanied by a form of sacred ambiguity that enabled diverse groups to project their aspirations onto them.
Fourth, justice and the needs of the time: The Shah focused on material development but failed to connect it with spiritual and identity-based needs. Revolutionary thinkers addressed this crisis through a transcendent metaphysical framework.
Fifth, opportunity for realization: The Pahlavi regime had decades to implement its vision, whereas the revolutionaries benefited from the “purity of distance” from power, rendering their utopia untested and therefore more appealing.
- Conclusion
The comparative analysis demonstrates that the success of a utopia in becoming a revolutionary driving force depends on its alignment with the collective imagination of society. The revolutionaries’ utopia, grounded in spirituality, justice, and active participation, succeeded in mobilizing the masses. However, an examination of the decades following the revolution shows that every utopia faces serious challenges at the stage of implementation. The Pahlavi utopia failed due to its authoritarian nature and neglect of national-religious identity. The revolutionary utopia, while highly successful in mobilization and regime change, has encountered difficulties in translating lofty ideals into everyday realities.
The central lesson of this study is that utopias require flexibility and continuous adaptation to the needs of their time in order to endure. Victory in revolution was the product of the power of dreams, but lasting stability depends on the sincere realization of those dreams. The gap between utopia and reality is precisely where any utopian project risks a crisis of legitimacy.
References
Asil, Hojjatollah (2014) Utopia in Iranian Thought, 3rd ed. (Electronic Version), Tehran, Ney.
Bornabaldaji, Somayyeh (2011) Investigating the Views of Five Contemporary Poets, M.A. Thesis in Persian Language and Literature, supervised by Mohammad Reza Torki, Tehran, University of Tehran.
Pezeshki, Mohammad et al. (2005) The Islamic Revolution and Why and How it Happened, 44th ed., Qom, Office for Publishing Maa'rif.
Pahlavi, Mohammad Reza (1977) Towards the Great Civilization, Tehran, Pahlavi Library.
Pahlavi, Mohammad Reza (1993) Response to History, translated by Hossein Abotrabian, Tehran, Motarjem.
Habibi, Seyyed Mohsen and Mohammad Saleh Shokoohi Bidehendi (2009) "Innovation and Creativity in the Early Years of the 21st Century, Mirzadeh Eshqi's Three Panels and Utopia," Architecture and Urban Planning (formerly Honar-ha-ye-ziba), Vol. 1, No. 38, pp. 93-103. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22286020.1388.1.38.9.3.
Khomeini, Ruhollah (n.d.) Kashf al-Asrar, n.p., n.p.
Khomeini, Ruhollah (1998) Velayat-e Faqih: Islamic Government, Tehran, Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works.
Davari Ardakani, Reza (2003) Farabi: The Philosopher of Culture, Tehran, Saqi.
Davari Ardakani, Reza (1977) Farabi: The Founder of Islamic Philosophy, 2nd ed., Tehran, Imperial Iranian Academy of Philosophy.
Rouvillon, Frederic (2006) Utopia in the History of Western Thought, translated by Abbas Bagheri, Tehran, Ney.
Satari Sarbanqoli, Hassan (2012) "Utopia in the Thoughts of Intellectuals of Constitutional Era of Iran", Journal of Fine Arts - Architecture and Urban Planning, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 55-64. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2012.29697.
Sardarnia, Khalilollah and Hossein Mohseni (2017) "Constitutional Intellectualism from Democratic Utopia to Authoritarianism (From the Perspective of Sociology of Knowledge and Romanticism)", Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science, Vol. 3, No. 11, pp. 87-121. https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2017.8105.
Samiei, Mohammad (2019) Power Struggle in Iran: Why and How Did the Clergy Win?, Tehran, Ney.
------------------------ (2021) Development and Happiness among Iranians: Why Do We Feel Like We Are Lost Generations?, Tehran, Ney.
Shariati, Ali (1983) Islamology (2), Tehran, Qalam.
--------------- (1982a) Human, Tehran, Elham.
--------------- (1982b) Worldview and Ideology, Tehran, Mona.
--------------- (1982c) Hussein, Heir of Adam, Tehran, Qalam.
--------------- (1982d) Religion Against Religion, Tehran, Sabz.
--------------- (1981a) Islamology (1), Tehran, Shariati.
--------------- (1981b) What Should Be Done?, Tehran, Qalam.
--------------- (1981c) Woman, Tehran, Sabz.
---------- (1980a) History of Civilization, Tehran, Office for Compilation and Editing of the Works of Martyr Dr. Ali Shariati.
--------------- (1980b) History and Recognition of Religions, Tehran, Tashayyo.
--------------- (1980c) Alawite Shi'ism and Safavid Shi'ism, Tehran, Tashayyo.
--------------- (1980d) The Class Direction of Islam, Tehran, Office for Compilation and Editing of the Works of Martyr Dr. Ali Shariati.
--------------- (1978a) Return, Europe, Hosseiniyeh Ershad.
--------------- (1978b) Shia, Europe, Hosseiniyeh Ershad.
--------------- (1978c) We and Iqbal, Europe, Hosseiniyeh Ershad.
--------------- (1978d) Prayer, Europe, Hosseiniyeh Ershad.
--------------- (1976a) With Familiar Audiences, Europe, Hosseiniyeh Ershad.
--------------- (1976b) Revolutionary Self-Cultivation, Europe, Hosseiniyeh Ershad.
Eivazi, Mohammad Rahim (2012) The Islamic Revolution and Its Historical Roots, Tehran, Payam -e Noor University.
Ghafari, Gholamreza (2009) "The Logic of Comparative Research," Iranian Social Studies, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 99-119. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20083653.1388.3.4.5.2.
Mannheim, Karl (2020) Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, translated by Fereydoon Majidi, Tehran, SAMT.
Motalabi, Masoud and Mohammad Mahdi Naderi (2009) "A Comparative Study of the Concept of Utopia in Islamic, Iranian, and Western Political Thought," Political Studies, No. 6, Winter, pp. 125-146.
Morteza Motahari (2019a) Family and Sexual Ethics, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (2019b) The Uprising and Revolution of Imam Mahdi (AS) and the Article of the Martyr, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (2018) The Decline and Rise of Civilizations from the Perspective of the Quran and Dialectical Logic, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (2017) Society and History in the Quran, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (2011) The Purpose of Life, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (2010) Sexual Ethics in Islam and the Western World, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (2006a) The Future of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (2006b) Monotheistic Worldview, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (2003) Ten Discourses, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (2002) Islam and the Needs of the Time, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (2001a) Philosophy of History, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (2001b) The Struggle Between Right and Wrong, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (1999) Notes, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (1998) A Critique of Marxism, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (1993) On the Islamic Revolution, Tehran, Sadra.
---------------------- (1978) The Reciprocal Services of Islam and Iran, Tehran, Sadra.
Motehari, Morteza and Mohammad Hossein Tabatabaei (2011) Principles of Philosophy and Realism Method, Tehran, Sadra.
Mo'men, Abolfath (2002) "The Pahlavi Quran!", Zamaneh, Issues 5 and 6, pp. 38-43.
Mirzaii, Jamshid (2023) "A Review of the Status of Comparative Research in the Field of Social Studies in Iran", Research in Social Studies Education, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 33-40. 10.48310/rsse.2024.15464.1176.
Nodehi, Kobra et al. (2016) "The Utopia of Leftist Poets in Mashhad (1320-1325)", Contemporary Persian Literature, Vol. 6, No. 18, pp. 75-100.
*Corresponding Author: Associate Professor, Department of Iranian Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
5091-1704-0002-0000
**Ph.D. Student, Department of Iranian Studies, Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
7317-3118-0003-0000
اصیل، حجتالله (1393) آرمانشهر در اندیشه ایرانی، چاپ سوم (نسخۀ الکترونیک)، تهران، نشرنی.
برنابلداجی، سمیه (1390) بررسی دیدگاه پنج تن از شاعران معاصر، پایاننامۀ کارشناسی¬ارشد در رشته زبان و ادبیات فارسی، به راهنمایی محمدرضا ترکی، تهران، دانشگاه تهران.
پزشکی، محمد و دیگران (1384) انقلاب اسلامی و چرایی و چگونگی رخداد آن، چاپ چهلوچهارم، قم، دفتر نشر معارف.
پهلوی، محمدرضا (۲۵۳۶) به سوی تمدن بزرگ، تهران، کتابخانۀ پهلوی.
-------------- (۱۳۷۲) پاسخ به تاریخ، ترجمۀ حسین ابوترابیان، تهران، مترجم.
حبیبی، سید محسن و محمدصالح شکوهی بیدهندی (1388) «نووارگی، نوآوری و نوپردازی سالهای نخستین قرن چهارده هـ.ش، میرزاده عشقی سه تابلو و آرمانشهر»، معماری و شهرسازی (هنرهای زیبا سابق)، سال اول، شماره ۳۸، صص ۹۳-۱۰۳.
https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22286020.1388.1.38.9.3.
خمینی، روحالله (بیتا) کشفالاسرار، بیجا، بینا.
------------ (۱۳۷۸) ولایتفقیه: حکومت اسلامی، تهران، مؤسسه تنظيم و نشر آثار امامخمينی(س).
داوری اردکانی، رضا (1382) فارابی: فیلسوف فرهنگ، تهران، ساقی.
--------------- (2536) فارابی: مؤسس فلسفۀ اسلامی، چاپ دوم، تهران، انجمن شاهنشاهی فلسفۀ ایران.
روویون، فردریک (1385) آرمانشهر در تاریخ اندیشۀ غرب، ترجمۀ عباس باقری، تهران، نشرنی.
ستاری ساربانقلی، حسن (1391) «آرمانشهر در آرای روشن¬فکران عصر مشروطۀ ایران»، نشریۀ هنرهای زیبا - معماری و شهرسازی، سال هفدهم، شماره ۱، صص ۵۵-۶۴.
https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2012.29697.
سردارنیا، خلیلالله و حسین محسنی (1396) «روشن¬فکری مشروطه از آرمانشهر دموکراتیک تا اقتدارگرایی (از منظر جامعهشناسی معرفت و رومانتیسم)»، مجلۀ دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، سال سوم، شماره ۱۱، صص ۸۷-۱۲۱.
https://doi.org/10.22054/tssq.2017.8105.
سمیعی، محمد (۱۳۹۸) نبرد قدرت در ایران: چرا و چگونه روحانیت برنده شد؟ تهران، نشرنی.
------------ (1400) توسعه و خوشبختی در میان ایرانیان: چرا احساس میکنیم نسلهای سوختهایم؟، تهران، نشرنی.
شریعتی، علی (1362) اسلامشناسی (۲)، تهران، قلم.
---------- (1361الف) انسان، تهران، الهام.
---------- (1361ب) جهانبینی و ایدئولوژی، تهران، مونا.
---------- (1361ج) حسین وارث آدم، تهران، قلم.
---------- (1361د) مذهب علیه مذهب، تهران، سبز.
---------- (۱۳۶۰الف) اسلامشناسی (۱)، تهران، شریعتی.
---------- (1360ب) چه باید کرد؟، تهران، قلم.
----------- (1360ج) زن، تهران: سبز.
---------- (1359الف) تاریخ تمدن، تهران، دفتر تدوین و تنظیم مجموعۀ آثار معلم شهید دکتر علی شریعتی.
---------- (1359ب) تاریخ و شناخت ادیان، تهران، تشیع.
---------- (1359ج) تشیع علوی و تشیع صفوی، تهران، تشیع.
---------- (1359د) جهتگیری طبقاتی اسلام، تهران، دفتر تدوین و تنظیم مجموعۀ آثار معلم شهید دکتر علی شریعتی.
---------- (1357الف) بازگشت، اروپا، حسینیۀ ارشاد.
---------- (1357ب) شیعه، اروپا، حسینیۀ ارشاد.
---------- (1357ج) ما و اقبال، اروپا، حسینیۀ ارشاد.
---------- (1356الف) با مخاطبهای آشنا، اروپا، حسینیۀ ارشاد.
---------- (1356ب) خودسازی انقلابی، اروپا، حسینیۀ ارشاد.
عیوضی، محمدرحیم (1391) انقلاب اسلامی و ریشههای تاریخی آن، تهران، دانشگاه پیامنور.
غفاری، غلامرضا (1388) «منطق پژوهش تطبیقی»، مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، سال دوم، شماره 4، صص 99-119.
https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20083653.1388.3.4.5.2.
مانهایم، کارل (۱۳۹۹) ایدئولوژی و اتوپیا: مقدمهای بر جامعهشناسی شناخت، ترجمۀ فریبرز مجیدی، تهران، سمت.
مطلبی، مسعود و محمدمهدی نادری (1388) «بررسی تطبیقی مفهوم آرمان¬شهر در اندیشه سیاسی اسلام، ایران و غرب»، مطالعات سیاسی، شماره ۶، زمستان، صص ۱۲۵-۱۴۶.
مطهری، مرتضی (1398الف) خانواده و اخلاق جنسی، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1398ب) قیام و انقلاب مهدی(ع) و مقالۀ شهید، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1397) انحطاط و ترقی تمدنها «از نظر قرآن و منطق دیالکتیک»، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1396) جامعه و تاریخ در قرآن، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1390) هدف زندگی، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1389) اخلاق جنسی در اسلام و جهان غرب، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (۱۳۸۵الف) آیندۀ انقلاب اسلامی ایران، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1385ب) جهانبینی توحیدی، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1382) ده گفتار، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1381) اسلام و نیازهای زمان، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1380الف) فلسفۀ تاریخ، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1380ب) نبرد حق و باطل، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1378) یادداشتها، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1377) نقدی بر مارکسیسم، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1372) پیرامون انقلاب اسلامی، تهران، صدرا.
----------- (1357) خدمات متقابل اسلام و ایران، تهران، صدرا.
مطهری، مرتضی و محمدحسین طباطبایی (1390) اصول فلسفه و روش رئالیسم، تهران، صدرا.
مؤمن، ابوالفتح (1381) «قرآن پهلوی»، زمانه، شمارۀ 5 و 6، صص 38-43.
میرزایی، جمشید (1402) «بررسی وضعیت پژوهشهای تطبیقی در حوزه مطالعات اجتماعی در ایران»، پژوهش در آموزش مطالعات اجتماعی، سال پنجم، شماره 4، صص 33-40.
doi:10.48310/rsse.2024.15464.1176.
نودهی، کبری و دیگران (1395) «آرمانشهر شاعران چپگرای مشهد (1320 تا 1325)»، ادبیات پارسی معاصر، سال ششم، شماره 18، صص ۷۵-۱۰۰.
Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia (2022) "utopia". Encyclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/utopia.
Lasky, Melvin J. (1976) Utopia and Revolution. the University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351300360.
Levitas, Ruth (2010) The Concept of Utopia. Peter Lang.
https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0353-0010-9.
Manuel, Frank E., Fritzie P. Manuel (1997) Utopian Thought in the Western World. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1rr6cx0.
Sargent, Lyman Tower (2010) Utopianism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199573400.001.0001.
Segal, Howard P (2012) Utopias: A Brief History from Ancient Writings to Virtual Communities. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118496053.
Supek, Rudi (1971) "Utopia and Reality". Translated by Slobodan Stanković. In https://www.marxists.org/archive/supek/1971/utopia-reality.htm.