Skinner and Tabatabai comparative method on thought history
Subject Areas : پژوهش سیاست نظری
1 -
2 - Assistant Professor of political science Institute for Humanities and Social Studies (IHSS).
Keywords: History of idea comparative philosophy words intentionality contextuality,
Abstract :
Skinner and Tabatabai as two prominent thinker on the history of ideas focused on the West and Iran are seeking to identify the origins of the tradition are thinking. Although both have the same purpose and research activities are similar in appearance but the basic difference between them. Consequently, it is clear that the fruits of their labor dispute. Skinner reviews the history of ideas with a deep belief in the history and negate the general opinion with regard to intentionality and intentions of the author examines the historical context And Tabatabai in any research activity , the dream of achieving modernity، dreamed that authors evaluated with respect to this issue. Finally, for reasons not fulfilled that dream. alas the decline of the concept is in Iran. With the eyes of the political and intellectual figures in Iran's history and its relation to modernity approached measure. And after each failure to conclude that a decline in Iran's history and decline of the concept. On the other hand Skinner without any prejudice and without taking any criterion , prominent writers within the language conventional And tries the author's intention with regard to the extensive literature recognize that time. However, in the first place many similarities between Skinner and Tabatabai reviews on there way but using the comparative method can be realized that there are fundamental differences in their work .In this study is to look at the use of comparative philosophy that bases its main ideas is to compare these two thoughtful note .